Connect with us

The Guardians of Democracy

The Guardians of Democracy

Trump Admin Ending In-Person Interpreters At Immigrants’ First Hearings: Report


Trump Admin Ending In-Person Interpreters At Immigrants’ First Hearings: Report

The Justice Department is reportedly planning to end the use of in-court interpreters for undocumented immigrants appearing at their first deportation hearings, where the migrants are informed of their rights and the schedule for their trials.

The San Francisco Chronicle reported Wednesday that under The Justice Department’s new plan, in-court translators would be replaced by videotaped instructions that explain to asylum seekers and other immigrants facing deportation the scope of their rights and how their proceedings will be carried out in immigration courts.

Justice Department officials reportedly informed immigration judges of the planned change last month.

The videos are pre-recorded in Spanish and a number of indigenous languages, the Chronicle reports.

An official with the agency told the Chronicle that the plan was “part of an effort to be good stewards of [DOJ’s] limited resources.”

The head of a union representing immigration judges, which are DOJ employees, told the newspaper that the DOJ’s plan would remove an “integral” part of the immigration court system.

“Interpreter cost is not a surprise cost — it’s an integral part of every case,” Ashley Tabaddor said, according to the newspaper.

“If they actually look at the courts as a real court, they would never be dismissive of the role of an interpreter. But the fact that we are here and have these budget shortfalls means they have prioritized the budget in a way that is dismissive of the integral role of the interpreters, and reflects the flaw of having the courts run by a law enforcement agency,” she added.

“What if you have an individual that speaks an indigenous language and has no education and is completely illiterate?” asked one judge, who remained anonymous in order to discuss the plan with the Chronicle.

“You think showing them a video is going to completely inform them of their rights? How are they supposed to ask questions of the judge?” the judge reportedly added, calling the decision “a disaster in the making.”


More in NEWS


To Top